Response to chapter 1

There’s a thing about journalism that sometimes works as a double-edged sword. There are multiple definitions and ways to understand it. It can be broad or incredibly narrow in scope and nuance. And oftentimes it’s misunderstood for something else. Or something else gets classified as journalism when it’s not. The objective of The Elements of Journalism is to help the reader get closer to the mission and the purpose of journalism, while helping journalists to find the element of service that seems to be forgotten or left behind at times.
One of the main underlying themes in the first chapter of the book is the question of how can journalism adapt to the new technologies available without renouncing to the core mission of providing the information that the public needs to make informed decisions about their life. One of the most consequential decisions of public life is casting a vote, and an informed electorate is vital for the good health of a democracy. “The primary purpose of journalism is to provide citizens with the information they need to be free and self-governing” (16-17). In order to provide information that your public needs, you need to be in touch with the community that you serve. The theory of interlocking public is an interesting tool that presents a viable way to address an increasingly diverse public that doesn’t consume news in a uniform manner and that doesn’t engage in the same way across the board.
It’s a theory to engage the public, but for modern outlets, it can serve as a philosophy to better serve their audience. Providing an array of different topics in which the public can experience different levels of engagement, so they can stay current in the topics at the top of their interest pyramid, learn new information about a subject that is less familiar, or find new areas if interest altogether.


It might seem like it’s an outdated idea. Super specialized websites, publications, and tv programmes are everywhere. Finding incredibly nuanced and specific information about every subject is easier than ever. But that super specialized interest can bring negative consequences and work against the idea that general knowledge of the world that surrounds us is a positive thing. By making a deliberate attempt to diversify the news that is offered to the public, and the news we consume, we are contributing to a community that’s better suited to govern itself and the overall health of its democracy. 

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Melissa Noel and Her Reporting on "Barrel Children"

News Matters response

Chapter 11 - Pushing Civil Rights Into the National Agenda