Response to chapter 1
There’s a thing about journalism that sometimes
works as a double-edged sword. There are multiple definitions and ways to
understand it. It can be broad or incredibly narrow in scope and nuance. And
oftentimes it’s misunderstood for something else. Or something else gets
classified as journalism when it’s not. The objective of The Elements of
Journalism is to help the reader get closer to the mission and the purpose of
journalism, while helping journalists to find the element of service that seems
to be forgotten or left behind at times.
One of the main underlying themes in the first
chapter of the book is the question of how can journalism adapt to the new
technologies available without renouncing to the core mission of providing the
information that the public needs to make informed decisions about their life.
One of the most consequential decisions of public life is casting a vote, and
an informed electorate is vital for the good health of a democracy. “The
primary purpose of journalism is to provide citizens with the information they
need to be free and self-governing” (16-17). In order to provide information
that your public needs, you need to be in touch with the community that you
serve. The theory of interlocking public is an interesting tool that presents a
viable way to address an increasingly diverse public that doesn’t consume news
in a uniform manner and that doesn’t engage in the same way across the board.
It’s a theory to engage the public, but for modern
outlets, it can serve as a philosophy to better serve their audience. Providing
an array of different topics in which the public can experience different
levels of engagement, so they can stay current in the topics at the top of
their interest pyramid, learn new information about a subject that is less
familiar, or find new areas if
interest altogether.
It might seem like it’s an outdated idea. Super
specialized websites, publications, and tv programmes are everywhere. Finding
incredibly nuanced and specific information about every subject is easier than
ever. But that super specialized interest can bring negative consequences and
work against the idea that general knowledge of the world that surrounds us is
a positive thing. By making a deliberate attempt to diversify the news that is
offered to the public, and the news we consume, we are contributing to a
community that’s better suited to govern itself and the overall health of its
democracy.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario